This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Cygwin changes needed for MSYS
- From: Alexey Pavlov <alexpux at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:05:39 +0400
- Subject: Re: Cygwin changes needed for MSYS
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20130730191200 dot GA7163 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130731151339 dot GA5751 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20131021151121 dot GC1514 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <52655DEA dot 2090501 at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm> <20140212175718 dot GA6065 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx>
2014-02-12 21:57 GMT+04:00 Christopher Faylor :
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 01:01:30PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>On 10/21/2013 11:11 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> Is it safe to assume that no one is actually interested in this?
>>
>>Interested, but too busy to do even my normal piss-poor job of
>>maintaining existing cygwin packages, much less investigate the new MSYS
>>hooks.
>>
>>The number of unread messages in my mingw-devel and mingw-user mailing
>>list folder keeps going up, so I assume folks over there are continuing
>>to work on MSYS 2.0. Maybe that's a bad assumption...
>
> YA ping. I've basically forgotten what I actually did here but I'm willing
> to dust off the effort if I can actually get someone to look at it.
>
> At this point, however, I don't think it's likely that anyone on the MSYS
> side of the fence really cares or will be willing to move to using cygwin1.dll.
>
Hi Christopher!
I'm not forgot it. Just on previous week I get your callout branch
from cvs sources to my git repo:
https://github.com/Alexpux/Cygwin/tree/callout
We still interesting in it and want to work on implementing it. But we
have more changes in cygwin sources than before.
Regards,
Alexey.
> cgf