This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 15:36:56 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
- References: <4E0721C7.6000709@users.sourceforge.net> <4E0A02D6.8030300@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20110628192153.GJ9552@calimero.vinschen.de> <1309290708.7596.34.camel@YAAKOV04> <4E0A32E6.4010709@redhat.com> <4E0A362D.7070105@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20110701170001.GB27001@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4E3CFEBE.7060201@users.sourceforge.net>
- Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 04:43:42PM +0800, JonY wrote:
>On 7/2/2011 01:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> Also, in 5 years when nobody is running 32 bit windows, will everybody
>>>> still be happy with all these 64s in their paths and filenames?
>>>
>
>They said that about Win9x, but they're still around :)
Watch your attributions: that quote came from Brendan Conoboy. But,
regardless, your response doesn't make much sense. We didn't create a
cygwin9x directory for Windows 9x and we didn't change the mount point
for cygwin for Cygwin 1.7.
cgf