This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?

From: Earnie <earnie at users dot sourceforge dot net>
To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:27:45 -0400
Subject: Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
References: <1310091995.6420.19.camel@YAAKOV04> <20110708065118.GA7372@calimero.vinschen.de> <1310115481.6420.108.camel@YAAKOV04> <20110708095603.GI4726@calimero.vinschen.de> <1310152024.6096.25.camel@YAAKOV04> <20110708203041.GB7025@calimero.vinschen.de> <20110708222213.GA31489@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <1310164887.6096.73.camel@YAAKOV04> <20110709011616.GB31489@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4E17B726.5070607@cwilson.fastmail.fm> <20110709093414.GD29867@calimero.vinschen.de>

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> So, how did it happen that /lib64 is prepended to
> ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, but all other libs are just plain filenames?
> Maybe that gives us some clue how to do it in Cygwin.

I wonder what the header information in /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 has
in itself?  Is ld picking the library name from the library file and
just inserting it into the executable?

Earnie

References:
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Christopher Faylor
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Charles Wilson
- Re: RFC: Cygwin 64 bit?
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]