This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal

From: "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre dot Humblet at ieee dot org>
To: Cygwin-Developers <cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 20:27:01 -0500
Subject: Re: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal
References: <20030117120131.GF1142@cygbert.vinschen.de><20030116190119.GD820@tishler.net><20030117120131.GF1142@cygbert.vinschen.de>

At 01:31 PM 1/21/2003 -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
>Corinna,
>
>> but I would appreciate if you implement the appropriate setre[ug]id32
>> calls plus the setre[ug]id wrapper.

Wouldn't this (post 1.3.19) instead be the right time to kick in the 
uid32 code? Corinna had indicated in the fall that it was "just" (my
words) a matter of introducing a few macros to split that change from 
the offset64 stuff?

New domain users regularly get burned by uids > 64k.

Pierre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal
  - From: Christopher Faylor

References:
- Re: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal
  - From: Jason Tishler
- Re: setregid() and setreuid() implementation proposal
  - From: Jason Tishler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]