-fno-rtti

[Conrad Scott]

"Conrad Scott" <Conrad.Scott@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> Would the alternative of compiling just the cygserver with rtti
be
> acceptable?  For the problem I've got (which is defining
equality
> operators on a class hierarchy) rolling my own code would
probably
> cost more in terms of space and time than the native C++ rtti.

I've found a way of doing this w/o dynamic_cast (and w/o being too
extremely horrible either), so I'll change over to that and avoid
the issue.  As you said in your reply "I'd rather not make a
conscious decision to do this when it can be avoided."  I'll go
with that :-)

// Conrad