This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: setup.exe busted. Please fix?


Wait.  I'm confused.  latest/gcc contains source tarballs too.  Is it
*setup* that's broken, or am I supposed to change something in the
contrib/ncftp/ directory?

gcc-2.95.2-5-src.tar.gz
gcc-2.95.2-5.tar.gz
gcc-2.95.2-6-src.tar.gz
gcc-2.95.2-6.tar.gz
gcc-2.95.2-9-src.tar.gz
gcc-2.95.2-9.tar.gz

--Chuck
ncftp contributor/maintainer

>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: setup.exe busted. Please fix?
> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:10:29 -0500
> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
> Reply-To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
> To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
> 
> I just built setup.exe and tried running it in a directory which
> contained both source and binary tarballs.  The "Select packages
> to install" part of the installation shows "upgrades" from things
> like:
> 
> 3.0.2-2         3.0.2-2-src     ncftp
> 
> The contrib/ncftp directory contains both the source and binary
> tar balls.
> 
> Could someone fix this, please?
> 
> cgf
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Re: setup.exe busted. Please fix?
> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:05:59 EST
> From: Brian Keener <bkeener@thesoftwaresource.com>
> To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
> 
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > 3.0.2-2  3.0.2-2-src ncftp
> >
> > The contrib/ncftp directory contains both the source and binary
> > tar balls.
> >
> > Could someone fix this, please?
> 
> Have you noticed this behavior before or do you think this is something
> new - not that it diminishes the fact it needs fixing - really just
> curious.  From what I recollect though - I started to say it had probably
> been there but it just hit me (big lightbulb) - this is probably a direct
> result of the previous change I submitted. :-(
> 
> Sorry - I'll take a look at it ASAP.
> 
> Do all source tarballs end in the -src convention or should we make it a
> convention??


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]