This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Making a 1.1.8 release... or is it 1.3.0?
- To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: Making a 1.1.8 release... or is it 1.3.0?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:56:50 -0500
- References: <3A7653B1.115EFB2F@ece.gatech.edu>
- Reply-To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:40:01AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>> Subject: Making a 1.1.8 release... or is it 1.3.0?
>> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:42:18 -0500
>> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>> Reply-To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
>> To: cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
>>
>> I think I'll be making a 1.1.8 release in the next couple of days.
>>
>> Earnie, I assume that w32api and mingw are ok, right? I'll make a new
>> release of those, too.
>>
>> In the future, if you would like me to make a release of either of those
>> separate from a cygwin release, let me know. That's why I uncoupled those
>> two releases from cygwin.
>>
>> Or, if you want to take over release duties for them, that's fine, too.
>>
>> On a different subject, is it time to bump the release to 1.3.0? Red Hat
>> is working on a 1.2.0 version of the DLL which is loosely based on 1.1.6
>> (or so). I wish I'd thought to bump the net release to 1.2.0 when we
>> branched but... I didn't.
>
>Don't forget to remove unctrl.h from the cygwin-1.1.8/1.3.0 release.
>(I'd check the current cvs since you might have already done this, but
>I'm on a REAL slow connection right now.)
Yep. I added it to my build script and it seems to have worked. I
can't take it out of newlib since I assume it is there for a reason
other than cygwin.
cgf