This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Is binutils correct?
- To: cygwin-developers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Is binutils correct?
- From: Mumit Khan <khan at NanoTech dot Wisc dot EDU>
- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 12:14:05 -0600
- cc: khan at hp2 dot xraylith dot wisc dot edu
Chris Faylor <cgf@cygnus.com> writes:
> Whild downloading the most recent version of binutils and gcc from
> the development snapshot, I noticed that the binutils date available
> for download is older than another version that I'd downloaded from
> Mumit's site. The one available is: binutils-19990818-1.tar.gz.
>
> I had this sitting around in my download directory:
> binutils-19990911.tar.gz
>
> Mumit, which one should we be using. I would think that the newer one was be
> tter.
19990818-1. There is relocation problems with 19990911 (look in cygwin dev
list about `can't strip cygwin dll' after I released the first snapshot).
Regards,
Mumit