This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Revisiting libcygwin.a/libc.a/libm.a
- To: Mumit Khan <khan at xraylith dot wisc dot EDU>
- Subject: Revisiting libcygwin.a/libc.a/libm.a
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 11:36:55 -0500
- Cc: cygwin-developers at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Would it be a good idea to eliminate the separate lib[cm].a for the next
net release? I've already got a modified Makefile for newlib and cygwin
which links libcygwin.a to libc.a and libm.a.
The last I checked, I think that there were inexplicable problems
with constructors when you linked libcygwin.a to libc.a.
Mumit, do you remember this? Do you have any further insight into the
problem? Do you still think that it's a good idea?
cgf