Re: [ITA] ghostscript, ghostscript-fonts-std, ghostscript-fonts-other

[Ken Brown <kbrown at cornell dot edu>]

On 10/31/2017 12:56 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/30/2017 5:55 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> > It would
> > also be nice if the updated URW fonts[2] would also be installed under
> > e.g. /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35.
>
> Is the attached what you had in mind?  Following Fedora, I only packaged 
> *.t1 and *.afm files, even though the source package also contains *.otf 
> and *.ttf.

Or did I misunderstand the second "also" in your mail above?  Wouldn't 
it suffice to just install the fonts in /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35 and 
add this to the ghostscript search path?

Ken