This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Question about clisp version naming
- From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:07:59 -0500
- Subject: Re: Question about clisp version naming
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5500B536 dot 4050108 at cornell dot edu> <1426112433 dot 11504 dot 18 dot camel at cygwin dot com> <874mpq4sxr dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <5503122C dot 9000601 at cornell dot edu> <871tkshf53 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <1426275761 dot 16148 dot 19 dot camel at cygwin dot com> <87fv98fyef dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid>
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 21:14 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Versioning
>
> The way I read this, there is no suggestion of putting these extra
> version parts in or after the %dist and/or build number, which is what
> we use the release field for.
Obviously we don't have %dist, but did you continue reading to the
"Non-Numeric Version in Release" section?
--
Yaakov