This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITA] base-files
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:15:51 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ITA] base-files
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <87ioqo2i3h dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20140407120842 dot GM2061 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20140407181910 dot GC5306 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20140407182015 dot GA5361 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20140407185552 dot GT2061 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20140407192314 dot GC5429 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20140407193051 dot GW2061 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <871tx9x725 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20140407194623 dot GA905 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <8761mjsnm4 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 08:05:39PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>> Package updates happen every five minutes so you were probably only
>> a minute or so from having inetutils upload privileges.
>
>I've seen that and almost put the update out, but I have one question: I
>gave the patched tar file a release number of "1p1" so that Chuck can
>continue to increment his releases as he wishes. That works fine when
>using genini, but I'm not sure what if upset would accept this as a
>valid package. If you think that's OK, then I'll set the !ready flags.
That's very thoughtful of you but I think I'd rather not experiment with
version number ordering. I think you should just bump the -N part to
the next higher number and let Chuck deal with bumping his version number
twice. I think that will be less confusing to upset and the end user.
On a side note: I REALLY REALLY hope Chuck is ok and is just on vacation
or something.
cgf