This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITA] base-files
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:23:14 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ITA] base-files
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <87ha6zz780 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20140316113131 dot GA7356 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <87siqivznh dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <87fvm9roxj dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20140402134124 dot GU2508 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <87ioqo2i3h dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <20140407120842 dot GM2061 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20140407181910 dot GC5306 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20140407182015 dot GA5361 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20140407185552 dot GT2061 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 08:55:52PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 7 14:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:19:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:08:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >>On Apr 5 12:20, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> >>> Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> >>> > FYI, I contacted Chuck off-list 6 days ago but he didn't reply yet.
>> >>>
>> >>> Same here.
>> >>>
>> >>> > I hope Chuck will still reply in the next couple of days, but if not, we
>> >>> > have to find some solution to be able to go forward.
>> >>>
>> >>> I am updating some packages this weekend, so if someone can make me
>> >>> temporarily maintainer for inetutils-server I'll repackage it without
>> >>> /etc/default/etc/shells and upload together with base-files and the
>> >>> other updates.
>> >>
>> >>Chris, can we do this by simple changing cygwin-pkg-maint temporarily?
>> >
>> >Yep. That would work.
>>
>> In theory, you shouldn't have to drop Chuck as a maintainer. You could
>> have both Achim and Chuck as inetutils-server maintainers.
>
>How so? Simply both maintainers in the same line, like this:
>
>inetutils Charles Wilson, Achim Gratz
>
>or two lines?
>
>inetutils Charles Wilson
>inetutils Achim Gratz
The latter.
The former would be viewed as one person named
"Charles Wilson, Achim Gratz".
cgf