This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Fixing packages which rely on obsolete packages
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:40:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: Fixing packages which rely on obsolete packages
- References: <20130622204921 dot GA2803 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130622211341 dot GA3271 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130624081429 dot GF31340 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130624090424 dot GA20822 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:04:24AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jun 24 10:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 22 17:13, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 04:49:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > >I'm refreshing the procedure for updating setup.ini on sourceware as
>> > >part of moving 64-bit Cygwin out of beta and I came across this:
>> > >[...]
>> > Here's a similar list for 64-bit packages. Apparently genini's error
>> > checking leaves something to be desired. Obviously some of these are
>> > not obsolete.
>>
>> Does that mean upset is already running all the time for 64 bit, or was
>> that only a test. I'm asking because I'd like to know if we still have
>> to use GEN-sware after upload or not for the time being.
>
>Scratch that question. Newly popping up md5.sum files are a rather
>good indication.
I don't know what you're inferring from md5.sum's but if I regenerated a
new setup64.ini, it was entirely by accident.
I'll send out a clear announcement when everything is working.