This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [RFU 64bit] gmp / mpfr / mpc / ppl / isl / cloog-ppl / cloog
- From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 17:27:15 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFU 64bit] gmp / mpfr / mpc / ppl / isl / cloog-ppl / cloog
- References: <8761zfu513 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <1366582084 dot 8384 dot 8 dot camel at YAAKOV04> <87bo97umuw dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <87r4htxj2m dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <517F64BE dot 3030806 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <87d2tc0wq3 dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid> <5180E407 dot 50504 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <87d2t99olv dot fsf at Rainer dot invalid>
On 2013-05-02 14:19, Achim Gratz wrote:
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
I would prefer that we stick with the naming used for the existing
64bit packages, which would not require a bunch of renamings on the
32bit side either.
You are asking for the impossible.
WRT Cygwin, I *specialize* in the "impossible". :-)
MPC is called mpclib in 32bit and libmpc in 64bit â which one to
keep?
While the libmpc name makes more sense IMO, as we're already using
mpclib, you could stick with that. Only the source package uses this
name, so changing this now won't really affect anything.
PPL has its doc in ppl-doc rather than libppl-doc in both 32bit
and 64bit â change to libppl-doc per your rules or keep?
My "rules" would say ppl-doc.
Yaakov