This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Recent cygport and cygwin-specific READMEs [Was: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?]
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:07:13 +0200
- Subject: Re: Recent cygport and cygwin-specific READMEs [Was: Re: GCC-4.7.2-2: Go/No-go?]
- References: <51661EA2 dot 1070801 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <51665212 dot 6050101 at gmail dot com> <51665F0F dot 8040902 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <5166AE89 dot 2050704 at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm> <51673B2E dot 9090602 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <CAHWeT-aCNzjTTq0qa59TPgBRkXo+60Qp13fmPvp7nrThJpbZhg at mail dot gmail dot com> <516A266E dot 8080504 at users dot sourceforge dot net> <51776518 dot 6030608 at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm> <20130424083402 dot GA12816 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <5177E431 dot 1020400 at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Apr 24 09:54, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 4/24/2013 4:34 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 24 00:52, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >>Why would simply shortening the PATH have this effect?
> >
> >Do you have a big environment? Thre's a chance that the stack address
> >moves due to that.
>
> $ printenv | wc
> 65 116 2418
>
> $ echo $PATH | wc
> 1 19 472
>
> Is that "big"?
No. Sorry, I have no idea what the problem is here. Did you rebase
again, just to be sure?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat