Hi Dave,
Hi Jari,
On Oct 14 13:56, Dave And Diane wrote:
Effectively yes. I'm cool with mlcscope being removed from the
package list when cscope appears.
Three followup questions:
- Does mlcscope provide functionality cscode doesn't? That might
be a point in favor of keeping it alive, unless you think it's
not that important.
- If we obsolete mlcscope, would it make sense to create a new, empty
mlcscope package which "requires" cscope so that cscope is automatically
replacing mlcscope in existing installations?
- If so, would it also make sense if the cscope package creates a
mlcscope symlink -> cscope to help people along which use mlcsope in
scripts (if that makes any sense at all??
Thanks,
Corinna