Re: realpath: cygutils or coreutils?

[Charles Wilson <cygwin at cwilson dot fastmail dot fm>]

On 1/30/2012 3:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> In particular, it is much more powerful than the realpath(1) currently
> offered by cygutils.  Should I build my next coreutils package with
> realpath included, and wait to upload it until we can coordinate a build
> with cygutils dropping the weaker variant?  Or do we want to keep the
> cygutils variant for a while longer?

I prefer standard tools when possible, and smaller cygutils. So, let's
go ahead and coordinate removing realpath from cygutils-$next.

I should have some time in the next few days to do this -- and the
pending csih bugfix...

--
Chuck