Re: setup.exe opening page graphic

[Warren Young <warren at etr-usa dot com>]

On 8/31/2011 3:42 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 30 13:51, Warren Young wrote:
> > On 8/30/2011 2:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > So I'd still love to see a still with a beveled, less glossy C, if
> > > > that's ok with you...
> > >
> > > did you have a chance to look into that?
> >
> > Still plinking away at it, an hour or so a night, off and on.
> >
> > It requires completely rebuilding the 3D model.
> >
> > Don't worry, I'll get you something eventually.
>
> But that sounds like a lot of work.  I really thought that would be
> simpler.

It's not really difficult.  Most of the delay comes from playing, 
procrastination, and perfectionism.

If you're trying to get something released, give me a deadline.  That 
will concentrate my efforts.

> Here's the reply from legal:  We can use your 2D results from the DAZ
> art, as long as you put your resulting work under a free license which
> plays nice along the GPL.  You don't have to assign copyright to some
> other entity like, say, Red Hat.
>
> GPL or FAL(*) both sound good to me; FAL matches the intent better, I
> guess.

Lacking any recommendation, I would have gone with some CC variant. 
I'll look into FAL first now.

If it turns out that I still like CC better, I'll check for GPL 
compatibility.  I can already rule out all the "Attribution" variants, 
for the same reason 4-clause BSD is incompatible, right?