This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [PATCH] Stop automatic dependency selection on setup.exe chooser screen
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:42:06 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop automatic dependency selection on setup.exe chooser screen
- References: <AANLkTileEcuy80itJgpZxn0R_X-Uio2eHjV5BLLphHXO@mail.gmail.com> <20100723031137.GA1475@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTindzUKOzf0Ajp2B6aw9MqM9Ncl1VQVu-0ehtOry@mail.gmail.com> <20100723045931.GB1475@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTikmlGUWf5itS-w9EbflG2rIFux1CKxu1EnPcDIs@mail.gmail.com> <20100723102208.GA2570@calimero.vinschen.de> <AANLkTikdrVV_i6HbxvWWfq4bpTe1RD=B=oCOy+V9R7tF@mail.gmail.com> <20100726084118.GB12672@calimero.vinschen.de> <AANLkTikX6qUYF10PYwakMoYxa2035JDVV3RDSK-GGJOf@mail.gmail.com> <20100805081805.GA12249@calimero.vinschen.de>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jul 31 21:44, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> On 26 July 2010 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > Is the above "The following packages are required to
>> > satisfy dependencies of your selection." ok? ??I'm wondering if it's
>> > a bit too wordy, but I admit I have no better way to say this.
>>
>> How about this?
>>
>> ======
>> Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
>> The following packages are required to meet dependencies.
>
>I would prefer "satisfy" instead of "meet". But it doesn't matter.
>Just go ahead.
I also find "meet" unsatisfying and think that "satisfy" would be better
wording.
If you agree and want to meet those requirements then I think we're
satisfied and you can check that in.
cgf