This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 1.7 installation failed (on network drive?)


On Dec  9 11:52, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Dec  8 18:21, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> >>Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
> >>>... Build a debug version of setup (you need gcc-3
> >>>for that since the -mno-cygwin option is still used), start it under
> >>>GDB, and set a breakpoint to filemanip.cc:468.  GDB will break there if
> >>>an error gets triggered.  Examine what status codes are returned.
> >>>See /usr/include/w32api/ddk/ntstatus.h what status code that is.
> >>OK; since setup is not a cygwin package, where would I get the
> >>sources in the first place? And is there a README telling me how to
> >>build a debug version (make debug?)?
> >Basically:
> >
> >  cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@cygwin.com:/cvs/cygwin-apps setup
> >  CC=gcc-3 configure
> >  make 'CFLAGS=-g'
> So I don't need to switch set-gcc-default-3.sh, thanks.
> Actually, I already checked out and compiled (after installing a
> bunch of dependencies) over night after cgf's pointer to
> http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html.
> However, I didn't include the -g flag, assuming that leaving out the
> final 'strip' step might suffice.

The important thing here is to avoid the default -O2 flag.  It makes
debugging a lot harder.

> >>In case I don't get it compiled, maybe you could prepare two debug
> >>versions (with/w/o the change below) and send them to me? I could
> >>take an extra trip to that lab tomorrow for testing.
> >Well, yes, but there's very little reason that you shouldn't get it
> >build.
> Kind of... I did the small change you suggested and ran make again
> for a second test build, and guess what happens?
> It's compiling *everything* again all over; that's not quite the
> purpose of make, is it?

Not exactly.  And doesn't happen for me.  Are you sure you're not
having a timestamp problem due to running two machines on asynchronous
times, one to build, one providing the storage?  Are you not using NTP?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]