This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:04:10AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 5/15/2009 12:25 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> At any rate, I'm rather tired of several YEARS of choosing the
>> 'Exp'erimental version of emacs from setup.exe, all because 22.1-3 works
>> better for me than the 'Stable' version. I'm all for whatever you
>> provide, and will be grateful for whatever you decide to mark as stable.
>
> And I'll be grateful for any advice from you or the other
> developers/maintainers as to when it's appropriate to make 23.0.92-1 the
> current version (for cygwin 1.7), assuming nothing goes wrong. Obviously it
> needs a few weeks of testing, but I'm not sure how many.
>
> I'd also like some advice as to what to do about cygwin 1.5. Is it
> expected that there will be a lot of people staying with 1.5? Should I try
> to leave them with an up-to-date emacs? It's pretty easy to do with
> cygport. (Thanks, Yaakov!)
If you release a new 1.5 version now then you will have a few weeks at least
to work out any wrinkles. So, it might make sense to have a stable version of
emacs since the old version apparently had so many problems.
OTOH, if it is a lot of trouble then just sticking with 1.7 is, IMO, fine.
Thanks very much for stepping up here. It is really appreciated.
cgf
- References:
- [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1
- Re: [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1
- Re: [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1
- Re: [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1
- Re: [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1
- Re: [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1
- Re: [RFU 1.7] {emacs,emacs-X11,emacs-el}-23.0.92-1