This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITA][1.7] lapack-3.1.1-2
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:28:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ITA][1.7] lapack-3.1.1-2
- References: <365521.93609.qm@web25005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Mar 20 16:16, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> I would like to adopt lapack.
>
> As the current lapack-3.0-8 include both the
> libraries and the development, I propose the following:
>
> lapack-3.0-9 obsolete and empty that requires
> liblapack
> [...]
> wget -r- np http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/lapack/
>
> ./lapack-3.0-9-src.tar.bz2
> ./lapack-3.0-9.tar.bz2
> ./lapack-3.1.1-2-src.tar.bz2
> ./liblapack/liblapack-3.0-9.tar.bz2
> ./liblapack/setup.hint
> ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2
> ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel/setup.hint
> ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel-3.0-9.tar.bz2
> ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2
> ./liblapack-devel/setup.hint
> ./liblapack_0/liblapack_0/liblapack_0-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2
> ./liblapack_0/liblapack_0/setup.hint
> ./liblapack_0/liblapack_0-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2
> ./liblapack_0/setup.hint
> ./setup.hint
Your obsoletion of lapack itself isn't correct. You still need the
lapack package yourself for the source archive. I would create an
empty lapack-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2 as well and keep the category intact.
There's also the problem that users of lapack won't get the new
lapack packages when updating. You should add liblapack_0 to the
lapack requirements, too.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat