This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: just got wrong DLLs or wrong mutt.exe [attn mutt maintainer]


On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:56:50AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:43:53AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>[Redirected to cygwin-apps]
>>
>>On Feb 24 16:28, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 01:55:33PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> >According to Tom Hall on 2/24/2007 1:40 PM:
>>> >>I think there's a bug in the Cygwin setup
>>> >>
>>> >>The problem turned out to be that the version of mutt.exe I got was
>>> >>looking for /usr/bin/cygcrypto-0.9.7.dll and /usr/bin/cygssl-0.9.7.dll
>>> >>but setup.exe sent me /usr/bin/cygcrypto-0.9.8.dll and
>>> >>/usr/bin/cygssl-0.9.8.dll.  After copying the .7 versions from another
>>> >>machine, mutt seems to be working fine :-).
>>> >
>>> >Actually, it means that Corinna's statement that "None of the packages
>>> >in the Cygwin net distribution is built against openssl 0.9.7 anymore."
>>> >in http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2007-02/msg00016.html is wrong.
>>> >The mutt maintainer needs to upload a new package in order to correct
>>> >this.  Meanwhile, I will let Corinna or the mutt maintainer decide if
>>> >the mutt setup.hint should be adjusted to point to openssl097
>>> >compatibility package instead of openssl.
>>> 
>>> I'm in the process of generating a new mutt package now.
>>
>>Ok, now the mutt package requires openssl097, which will work better for
>>setup, but that's not the solution.  Openssl 0.9.8 is part of the Cygwin
>>distro since July 2005.
>>
>>I don't remember the history here, but for the mutt package I have two
>>maintainers in my list, Gary and cgf, cgf with a question mark.
>>
>>Can anybody of you two please upload a new mutt version which links
>>against openssl 0.9.8?
>
>Uh.  What part of "I'm in the process of generating a new mut package
                                                           mutt
>now" was unclear?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]