This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Counter-ITP of doxygen (was: Re: Please upload: doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1 (n'th take))
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 11:17:54 -0400
- Subject: Re: Counter-ITP of doxygen (was: Re: Please upload: doxygen-1.4.2_20050410-1 (n'th take))
- References: <007a01c54505$715f9650$6600a8c0@almaden.ibm.com> <074801c54793$f25d90f0$6508a8c0@chimaera> <20050425180953.GA14164@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <013901c54fd7$fbebba60$e6ec6f83@chimaera> <20050503145146.GA29487@calimero.vinschen.de>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:51:46PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 3 13:02, Max Bowsher wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>The fact that a few words of mild intention can be misinterpreted and
>>seed an accidental high tension mess has been amply well demonstrated
>>on the cygwin list recently, in the CGF/GRVS thread.
>
>So you're comparing your specific situation with Gary's years long
>history of adding useless comments to cgf's postings in the Cygwin ML?
>I don't think that's the same and I don't think that's a convincing
>argument at all.
Big ditto, but any further discussion on this should go to cygwin-talk.
It's certainly not valid here.
Puzzling analogies aside, if maxb wants to be the new doxygen
maintainer, I'll withdraw my objections.
cgf