This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [Review: no go] script-20041106-1
- From: Andrey Butov <andreybutov at yahoo dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 13:04:56 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: [Review: no go] script-20041106-1
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=eny7orTti4jqvn11mo5hXeYhXKwSdOw1icqqTgNBm0hd5CFY3/CuXZe+Ew2/KpX1ucUVsB+JJQdiudPQXj70wPHALhlke+Lcs3zUHFiVmxUnuGdGTWdLDH0tLUvomDJ1lwigyfO7aJZtZ/frm66Hyac/OdZFPxSeiNYG+n4TVs0= ;
The script command here is identical in options to the
Solaris/Darwin implementation, meaning it takes the -a
option to append and nothing else. There are other
implementations which offer more options, but I've
used the Solaris version for years, and wanted to
implement a version identical to that one to Cygwin.
To cygwin implementations have to follow a certain
specific UNIX implementation?
Andrey.
--- Christopher Faylor
<cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 03:45:32PM -0500, Igor
> Pechtchanski wrote:
> >BTW, regarding CGF's comment that this is
> automatically accepted: this is
> >*NOT* a port of "script" from util-linux, this is a
> completely new
> >implementation, and as such, IMO, needs to be voted
> on.
>
> If this isn't a completely compatible script command
> for cygwin then it
> really shouldn't even be considered. We're trying
> to emulate UNIX here,
> not create new programs with different options.
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com