This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITP] bashdb, bash_completion
- From: Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowitz at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:24:10 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ITP] bashdb, bash_completion
- References: <417AE12E.3060300@x-ray.at> <417D8E97.7020501@x-ray.at>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Reini Urban wrote:
| I updated bash-2.05b-rebash to use Pierre's PID-reuse patch from today.
| This is named "bashdb" in suse, and includced in debian's bash-3 so I
| would need just a GTG. (or a better name suggestion)
|
|
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/bash-2.05b-rebash/bash-2.05b-rebash-0.43-2.tar.bz2
|
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/bash-2.05b-rebash/bash-2.05b-rebash-0.43-2-src.tar.bz2
| http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/publ/cygwin/bash-2.05b-rebash/setup.hint
If I'm not mistaken, I don't think setup.exe/upset will like such a
package name "bash-2.05b-rebash". I think every part of the package
name (after each hyphen) must start with a letter (unlike the version
part, which must start with a number).
In any case, I'd be weary of having two packages with colliding files.
Is there some way to work around this?
Yaakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBfbVJpiWmPGlmQSMRAgeCAKCVTGke0cu3JKqKvZxH7Lm1b1dUiACdFQyL
Ze4MnnUmK+G3Ne5ndkqoy8Y=
=4UBx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----