Re: gcc 3.3.3 builds "corrupt" lesstif-0.93.94

["Gerrit P. Haase" <gp at familiehaase dot de>]

Charles Wilson wrote:

> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > Does this mean that I should generate a new version of binutils?
>
>
> Releasing a new binutils would help with the data alignment issue
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2004-09/msg00230.html
> (errm...will this cause compatibility problems?  I don't *think* so, but 
> someone more informed than I should wiegh in)
>
> However, a new binutils would not help with the .rdata issue
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01101.html
> but the .rdata+libtool problem SHOULD be addressed by the 
> libtool-devel-1.5.10-1 package, at a mirror near you:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01151.html
>
> There may be non-libtool-related instances where the .rdata issue is 
> biting someone, but I haven't seen any confirmed reports of that...yet.

Yes, I confirm that binaries are broken with or without 
libtool-devel-latest, i.e. when popt is used and the standard:

 const struct poptOption options[] = {
     ...
     {"version", 'v', POPT_ARG_NONE, &cl_output_version, 0,
      "Output compiler version and serial", NULL},
     ...
 }

is used.


Gerrit
--
=^..^=