This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: generic build doubts

From: Lapo Luchini <lapo at lapo dot it>
To: Mailing List: CygWin-Apps <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:30:35 +0100
Subject: Re: generic build doubts
References: <403B4614.5030506@lapo.it> <Pine.GSO.4.56.0402241002160.13702@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

BTW, would it make sense to turn on signing if gpg is installed (unless
it's explicitly turned on or off from outside, of course)?

Mhhh... yes, I guess so: not so many peolpe have GPG installed but don't have generated a key pair... so the signature command should "work" anyway. But maybe people wouldn't like the script to stop asking for a pwd.

I think the best idea is to but another variable: BATCH.
If it is 1 many thing (such as SIG) are automatically skipped.

Right now only SIG comes to my mind, but a variable named BATCH could be easier to understand to who need it to work "in batch", I guess..?

--
L a p o   L u c h i n i
l a p o @ l a p o . i t
w w w . l a p o . i t /
http://www.megatokyo.it

Follow-Ups:
- Re: generic build doubts
  - From: Igor Pechtchanski

References:
- generic build doubts
  - From: Lapo Luchini
- Re: generic build doubts
  - From: Igor Pechtchanski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]