This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [Review - Almost GTG] TeXmacs: A scientific wysiwyg Editor and Interface for Computer Algebra Systems
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:53:03 -0500
- Subject: Re: [Review - Almost GTG] TeXmacs: A scientific wysiwyg Editor and Interface for Computer Algebra Systems
- References: <401FF822.7080800@gmx.net> <Pine.GSO.4.56.0402031500390.24268@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:07:56PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Andreas Seidl wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>> Interestingly, gcc-3.2 has a hit, but *not* gcc-3.3:
>>
>> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Input_iconv.h
>> usr/include/gnu/gcj/convert/Output_iconv.h
>>
>> And gcc-3.2-3.tar.bz2 is four times as big as gcc-3.3.1-3.tar.bz2.
>
>Starting with gcc-3.3.1, the monolithic 'gcc' package got split into
>'gcc', 'gcc-g++', 'gcc-gcj', 'gcc-ada', etc, with the source in
>'gcc-core'. The above two files will probably have moved to 'gcc-gcj'.
I haven't been paying close attention but perhaps this discussion should
be moved to the cygwin mailing list. This topic has been rehashed many
times there. If we haven't reached the point where we can actually *build*
the package then it clearly shouldn't even be a candidate for an ITP.
cgf