This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-21
- From: "Abe Backus" <abraham at backus dot com>
- To: <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:06:51 -0700
- Subject: RE: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-21
Did "check" get the votes it needs? +1. Anything to help testing and
verification is great :)
-----Original Message-----
> Package: check 0.8.4-1
> Description: A unit test framework for C
> Proposer: Gerrit P. Haase
> Proposal:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00339.html
> http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/check/check-0.8.4-1.tar.bz2
> http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/check/check-0.8.4-1-src.tar.gz
> http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/check/setup.hint
> Reviews: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak (2003-09/msg00345.html)
> Aye votes: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak (2003-09/msg00345.html) [1/3]
> Status: Package available. Reviewed.
> HOLD-UPS: Not enough votes (need 2 more).
Oh girls (and boys), I need it because `make check` for libexpat depends on
it, libexpat is used e.g. by XFree86 and gettext so give me a chance. I'm
willing to maintain it, the review was 'ok', so what is the problem here?
Why are you so picky with your voting? Look at other distributions packages
list, e.g. for Suse you get the DVD with 6000 packages...