This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released
- From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps at hotmail dot com>
- To: <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 21:39:42 +1100
- Subject: Re: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released
- References: <000b01c2e66f$38323cd0$c29ac250@leper> <BAY2-DAV72jt8gsVWDK00017406@hotmail.com>
A lil slow off the mark ... but here we go...
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/nano/nano-1.2.0-1.tar.bz2
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/nano/nano-1.2.0-1-src.tar.bz2
http://www-personal.usyd.edu.au/~gpea0679/nano/setup.hint
looks ready to go to me ... - it seemingly got compiled with the
crosscompiler... but the resultant package appears to work flawlessly.
(guess i'll look into fixing my copy of the build script some more later)
And unlike 1.1.10 - i dont have a 1.8meg patch due to po files regeneration
differences.
Gareth - experiencing another one of those 'maintainer moments'.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps at hotmail dot com>
To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 6:48 AM
Subject: Re: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released
> My holidays end today, I'll look into stoping being slack and try to
release
> asap.
> 1.1.11/12/pre1/pre2 all had issues - but i havent noticed anything much
> reported back against 1.2.0 on the nano-devel list - so it should be fine.
>
> Gareth Pearce - nano 'maintainer' (for lack of a betterword)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net>
> To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
> Cc: <fergus at bonhard dot uklinux dot net>
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 6:08 AM
> Subject: nano editor : v.1.2.0 released
>
>
> > For users of the editor nano and the Cygwin-supplied version 1.1.10-1:
> there
> > is an update to nano version 1.2.0 available at their site
> > http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v1.2/nano-1.2.0.tar.gz that seems to
> install
> > oob (configure / make / make install) and works well. To the maintainer:
> is
> > there any possibility, when you have a moment, and if this passes your
> > quality checks, that this update could be incorporated into the Cygwin
> > provision? Fergus
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> >
> >
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>