This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: /etc/setup/setup.cfg ?


> On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 07:58, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:49:27AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > > > >Also, I'd prefer /etc/setup.rc rather that /etc/setup/setup.cfg.
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't /etc/setuprc be somewhat more consistent with existing unix
> > > > practices?
> > >
> > > Sure. I'm happy with that too. Mind you, having an extension allows
> > > association of a handler in the windows GUI.
> > >
> >
> > *.rc is a Windows resource file though.
>
> ... which was the primary reason for my suggesting .cfg in the first
> place.  I'm ok with both setuprc and setup.rc, through (leaning towards
> setuprc, if we go with Unix style).

How about [/etc/]setup.conf ? it follows the (other) unix convention of
configuration file naming.


Regards,

Elfyn McBratney
elfyn at exposure dot org dot uk
www.exposure.org.uk



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]