This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [nasm packaging review] was Re: Pending packages status
- From: "Max Bowsher" <maxb at ukf dot net>
- To: "Pavel Tsekov" <ptsekov at gmx dot net>,"Dean Scarff" <p00ya at operamail dot com>
- Cc: <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 10:32:09 -0000
- Subject: Re: [nasm packaging review] was Re: Pending packages status
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0212301106120.2844-100000@moria.atlanticsky.com>
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Dean Scarff wrote:
>
>> Done, the new binary package nasm-0.98.35-2 has everything except
>> the pdf (due to ghostscript problems as I mentioned elsewhere).
>> Updated files are here:
>>
>> http://proud-x.com/~p00ya/cygwin-apps/nasm/setup.hint
>> http://proud-x.com/~p00ya/cygwin-apps/nasm/nasm-0.98.35-2.tar.bz2
>> http://proud-x.com/~p00ya/cygwin-apps/nasm/nasm-0.98.35-2-src.tar.bz2
>
> Ok, I've just reviewed the package. Do you mind moving the contents of
> /usr/doc/nasm to /usr/doc/nasm-0.98.35 ?
>
> Btw, please, do not update the cygwin specific part of the package
> version number when releasing an updated version in the process of
> reviewing.
Didn't the last discussion on this agree on *DO* update the Cygwin-specific
release number during reviewing?
Max.