Re: xerces-c, xerces-c-devel, xerces-c-doc 2.1.0-2 available forreview/upload

[Robert Collins <rbcollins at cygwin dot com>]

On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 01:01, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> > Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that
> > version, you should not rename it to -1, else when -2 comes out, all the
> > testers will fail to upgrade. So -3 in review, stays as -3 when
> > uploading. Likewise, updating -1 to -2 to -3 during the review process
> > allows the testers to update properly. Does that make sense?
> 
> Ok, but if one releases a new Cygwin package shouldn't it get -1, which
> will make it first Cygwin release of this package ? And I'm under the
> impression that xerces is a new package :)

No, it should get *a* number that will then monotonically increase
within the same vendor version number.

Rob
 

-- 
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part