This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
- From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 11:06:02 +0200
- Subject: Re: And one more package, astyle Re: New Package: doxygen-1.2.17
- References: <F1230UumXCr68LTyAAf00008d93@hotmail.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:40:53AM +0000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> Hmmm I was under the impression that for a package to be accepted it needed
> a) - someone to check it for packaging.
> b) - at least 3 votes saying that it is desired to be seen in the
> distribution.
>
> which so long as person in a) is competant - seems fine to me.
Ok, that's no. 2 and other packages are still missing the pro votes.
I could step in and be no. 3 but...
...where are all the subscribers of this list? How should we ever
get enough positive votes for a package if nobody cares? I always
see the same names if it comes to vote for a package and I see
always the same (less) names if it comes to reviewing a package.
The Cygwin net distro isn't sort of a one man show, it's a community
effort. It's not Chris and me who are the responsible people for
reviewing a package and we are not the only people with the right
to upload packages.
Please note, *all* maintainers are welcome to give his/her voice for
a new package.
And by all means I think a positive vote should be combined with at
least *some* reviewing of a package.
I failed to check this in the past sometimes but I will not upload
a package with less than three positive votes in future.
Outstanding packages:
procps (reviewed, 2 votes, John and me)
ELFIO (reviewed, 2 votes, Joshua and Nicholas)
doxygen (reviewed, 0 votes)
astyle (NOT reviewed, 1 vote, Gareth)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.