This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
That would be no problem. However, I'm pretty sure someone on this cygwin-apps list instructed me initially to go ahead and strip the DLL. So could I get a third opinion? Should I remove the stripping? Should I rebase the DLL and then strip it (don't even know if this option makes sense or fixes Stipe's problem)? Does rebase need a change to be able to handle this case?
Thanks,
--Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:tolj@wapme-systems.de]
Sent: Tue 07/16/02 4:36 AM
I guess I know what the problem is about your packaged cygcurl-2.dll.
In both current packages 7.9.6-1 and 7.9.8-1 you have packaged a
stripped DLL. It seems when you rebase a stripped DLL the resulting
DLL is corrupt.
Hence any DLL inside a binary package should *not* be stripped to be
able to rebase it.
Can you please repackage to a new 7.9.8-2 with a *non* stripped
cygcurl-2.dll and announce availability to cygwin-apps@??
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |