This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: vmstat
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:53:54 -0400
- Subject: Re: vmstat
- References: <OF9302AC86.0EB950DE-ON85256BE4.005579C2@isn.instinet.com> <00b901c21df9$1c9e3df0$0100a8c0@advent02> <20020627163750.GA27819@redhat.com> <010901c21dfa$de6d74e0$0100a8c0@advent02> <3D1B5A59.7090609@ece.gatech.edu> <3D1B92A6.4020707@ece.gatech.edu> <024101c22216$d81624f0$0100a8c0@advent02> <20020703104813.R21857@cygbert.vinschen.de>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 10:48:13AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 11:21:42PM +0100, Chris January wrote:
>> > > Ok. Do you have any thoughts on where I should put ps.exe and kill.exe?
>> >
>> >
>> > I ended up renaming 'clear.exe' from the ncurses dist to 'clearn.exe' to
>> > avoid conflicts with the 'clear' package. (In ncurses, 'clear.exe' is
>> > not a 'test' program, so it didn't go into bin/ncurses-test-*/; it went
>> > into ${prefix}/bin -- hence the conflict which required rename)
>> >
>> >
>> > > They need to be somewhere other than /bin, but available should the user
>> > > wish to use them. Perhaps I could rename them instead? procps.exe and
>> > > prockill.exe, although those names are a little unweidly.
>> > > If anyone has any ideas, then please make a suggestion.
>> >
>> >
>> > pps.exe and pkill.exe ? Actually, proc*.exe isn't bad -- and the user
>> > can always alias whatever he wants.
>> Will this package actually appear on the mirrors in future or are there
>> issues I am not aware of preventing this from happening?
>
>I assume you changed the names of the binaries already? I'm sorry, could
>you please resend the URLs to the files?
Did we actually have two maintainers saying "this is good"? I don't
recall.
cgf