This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: question about objdump output format ?
- From: "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf dot Habacker at freenet dot de>
- To: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>, <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, "Cygwin-Apps" <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>, "Binutils" <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 13:49:27 +0200
- Subject: RE: question about objdump output format ?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ralf Habacker [mailto:Ralf.Habacker@freenet.de]
> > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:02 PM
> > To: Robert Collins; Cygwin-Apps; Binutils
> > Subject: RE: question about objdump output format ?
> >
> >
> > > > A side effect of this is, that objdump
> > > > prints each line twice (the second line contains no additional
> > > > infos), which blows up listing on bigger libs (for example about
> > > > 35000 lines of 100860 for the kdecore dll from kde 2.2.2), so my
> > > > question is, are there any objections for removing this ?
> > > >
> > > > 001540f0 0017f218 ffffffff ffffffff 00189390 00003934
> > > >
> > > > DLL Name: qt-2-3.dll
> > > > vma: Hint/Ord Member-Name
> > > > 181798 844 _7QString$null 5ff556b8 (1)
> > > ...
> > > > 5ff556b8 844 _7QString$null (2)
> > >
> > > Yes, it is providing differnet information. The extra info is the
> > > bound address, and thus should not be removed.
> > >
> > But this is printed already in line (1), so line (2) gives no
> > more informations
>
> Oops. I missed that. If you made (1) look like the following, I have no
> obbjection to (2) going:
>
> vma: Hint/Ord Member-Name Bound-To
> 181798 844 _7QString$null 5ff556b8 (1)
>
I will change this, but let us see what Nick Clifton say about this
Ralf