This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: rebasing new packages?!
- From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd at yahoo dot com>
- To: Robert Collins <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- Cc: Jason Tishler <jason at tishler dot net>, cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 10:00:29 -0400
- Subject: Re: rebasing new packages?!
- References: <FC169E059D1A0442A04C40F86D9BA7600C5FA9@itdomain003.itdomain.net.au>
- Reply-to: Earnie Boyd <Cygwin-Apps at Cygwin dot Com>
Robert Collins wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@tishler.net]
> > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:52 PM
>
> > > As long as the required dependencies are easily satisfied:
> > > a) STL headers + any libs for gcc on cygwin (i.e. OOTB build for
> > > developers).
> >
> > Isn't a) already satisfied?
>
> Possibly. I'm simply setting expectations.
>
> > > b) STL headers + any libs for gcc -mno-cygwin (i.e. how I
> > build, and
> > > the documented release build on
> >
> > Is b) satisfied by the following?
> >
> http://www.colomsat.net.co/freehost/ngiraldo/cppcygwin.html
>
> b) is an alternative approach to what I've already documented here. So
> it covers libstc++ aka libg++-3. I don't know how much of the STL that
> includes (see my earlier email).
>
> > > http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html).
> > > c) STL headers + any libs for a linux hosted cross-chain targeting
> > > mingw. I.e. how I expected Chris builds.
> >
> > I don't know how to satisfy c).
> >
>
> If a & b are satisfied with the libg++-3 library and headers, then c) is
> trivial.If not then someone needs to check it is doable.
As long as rules a && b are followed in rule c then c is doable.
Earnie.