This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2

From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <tolj at wapme-systems dot de>
Cc: "cygwin-apps" <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 01:03:23 +1100
Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
References: <3C3EE6D5.8916443E@wapme-systems.de> <72101602526.20020111144934@familiehaase.de> <3C3EF0C4.8E174E43@wapme-systems.de>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stipe Tolj" <tolj@wapme-systems.de>
> > Since `httpd' is more general I would prefer `apache'
> > from these two layouts.
>
> I disagree here! It's common style to have the protocoll name for /etc
> and /var sub-directories.

httpd is not the protocol name. It's a hangover from the CERN httpd that
started it all.

> BTW, RedHat and SuSE layout look pretty similar.
>
> Any other opinions from the list?

yes, /etc/apache please. Otherwise tinyhttpd or other www servers will
conflict with apache.

Rob

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
  - From: Earnie Boyd

References:
- [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
  - From: Stipe Tolj
- Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
  - From: Gerrit P. Haase
- Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
  - From: Stipe Tolj

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]