Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on sourceforge]

["Paul Garceau" <pgarceau at qwest dot net>]

Hmmm...

On 4 Apr 2001, at 14:46, the Illustrious Earnie Boyd wrote:

> So why tsk me?  Chris asked the question.  Obviously the answer is yes,
> we need a cygwin-apps FAQ-O-MATIC.
> 
> Earnie.

	Perhaps he doesn't know what a faq-o-matic is...?

	At any rate, an example can be found at the gcc main website 
(www.gnu.org/gcc?).

	In its simplest form, (afaik) a faq-o-matic allows someone to add a 
faq to a list of pre-defined faqs if they are authorized to add such 
things...

	Peace,

		Paul G.

> 
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > 
> > Earnie! tsk tsk.
> > 
> > Please search the archives before asking questions :]
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2000-08/msg00036.html
> > 
> > Rob
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Earnie Boyd" <earnie_boyd@yahoo.com>
> > To: <cygwin-apps@cygwin.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 7:53 AM
> > Subject: Re: cygwin-apps FAQ [WAS: Re: for interest: cygwin rpm on
> > sourceforge]
> > 
> > > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:12:55PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > > >>Can cygwin1.dll be statically linked into setup.exe or rpm.exe ?
> > > > >
> > > > >No.
> > > > >
> > > > >>Or cygwin1.dll may be placed in the same directory with
> > > > >>setup.exe
> > or
> > > > >>rpm.exe, so they can load cygwin1.dll in the setup time.
> > > > >
> > > > >The whole point of setup is to avoid having to make the user do
> > things
> > > > >like this.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe we need a cygwin-apps FAQ.
> > > >
> > >
> > > How about one of those CGI FAQ-O-MATIC type?
> > >
> > > Earnie.
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 




Nothing real can be threatened.
    Nothing unreal exists.